<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Expression Web Designer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/#comment-8959</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=29#comment-8959</guid>
		<description>It can be a little hard to believe, Brian!  I wrote on the sad choice to use Word to render HTML in Outlook a while ago - &lt;a href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/one-step-forward-one-step-back/"&gt;One Step Forward, One Step Back&lt;/a&gt;. As I've said before, though, I don't think it's a problem with &lt;em&gt;commitment&lt;/em&gt; to standards; I think it's more of a communication issue.  There's no competent central standards group at Microsoft with oversight on these issues.

Possibly, however, &lt;a href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/molly-holzschlag-working-with-internet-explorer/"&gt;Molly Holzschlag's influence&lt;/a&gt; will be something useful!

I'm not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be a little hard to believe, Brian!  I wrote on the sad choice to use Word to render <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> in Outlook a while ago - <a href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/one-step-forward-one-step-back/">One Step Forward, One Step Back</a>. As I&#8217;ve said before, though, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a problem with <em>commitment</em> to standards; I think it&#8217;s more of a communication issue.  There&#8217;s no competent central standards group at Microsoft with oversight on these issues.</p>
<p>Possibly, however, <a href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/molly-holzschlag-working-with-internet-explorer/">Molly Holzschlag&#8217;s influence</a> will be something useful!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not holding my&nbsp;breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Z</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=29#comment-8943</guid>
		<description>Maybe &lt;em&gt;Expression&lt;/em&gt; was a standards smokescreen??

It only took nine months, if that, for Microsoft to fall back on their standards promise. Yep, they are so committed to standards, they built in &lt;em&gt;Outlook 2007&lt;/em&gt; their &lt;em&gt;Microsoft Word&lt;/em&gt; HTML rendering engine to render HTML e-mails. It fails to support most of CSS 2. 

We all would love to believe that Microsoft is committed to standards. Unfortunately, time and time again we see the opposite. When will Microsoft fully wake up? I guess their still experiencing their "wow" with all the blue screens &lt;em&gt;Vista&lt;/em&gt; is producing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe <em>Expression</em> was a standards smokescreen??</p>
<p>It only took nine months, if that, for Microsoft to fall back on their standards promise. Yep, they are so committed to standards, they built in <em>Outlook 2007</em> their <em>Microsoft Word</em> <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> rendering engine to render <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> e-mails. It fails to support most of <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> 2. </p>
<p>We all would love to believe that Microsoft is committed to standards. Unfortunately, time and time again we see the opposite. When will Microsoft fully wake up? I guess their still experiencing their &#8220;wow&#8221; with all the blue screens <em>Vista</em> is&nbsp;producing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=29#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update, Cheryl!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update,&nbsp;Cheryl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl D Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/05/microsofts-expression-web-designer/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl D Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 05:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=29#comment-20</guid>
		<description>While I do not yet have any accessibility related tutorials on EWD up a FAQ is now available and half a dozen tutorials have been added. The tutorials are a mix of text based and ordo tutorials. Approximately one third of the videos are open captioned and the others will have captioning eventually.

Cheryl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do not yet have any accessibility related tutorials on EWD up a <acronym title="Frequently Asked Questions">FAQ</acronym> is now available and half a dozen tutorials have been added. The tutorials are a mix of text based and ordo tutorials. Approximately one third of the videos are open captioned and the others will have captioning eventually.&nbsp;Cheryl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
