<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Obsessive about Web Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Convert</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-29443</link>
		<dc:creator>Convert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-29443</guid>
		<description>Does any one know how to add a content into missing alt tags found in avatar-images in wordpress comments? The Alt tags there are missing, it&#039;s mandatory to have them as per xhtml compliance, I was just wondering how to fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does any one know how to add a content into missing alt tags found in avatar-images in wordpress comments? The Alt tags there are missing, it&#8217;s mandatory to have them as per xhtml compliance, I was just wondering how to fix&nbsp;that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Cath!  Nice to see you showing up here, as well!

It&#039;s tough to keep up, I know - but the important thing, to my mind, is to keep trying.  Even though it&#039;s possible that some people will hold one or two errors against you, you should always know that THOSE people are just being obnoxious - you know the work you&#039;ve put in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Cath!  Nice to see you showing up here, as&nbsp;well!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough to keep up, I know - but the important thing, to my mind, is to keep trying.  Even though it&#8217;s possible that some people will hold one or two errors against you, you should always know that THOSE people are just being obnoxious - you know the work you&#8217;ve put&nbsp;in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>Good article Joe.  Being someone who is new to web design, accessibility and validating code, I admit to being a little obsessive about validating my pages, not every day, but after every update or change.  I posted about this at Cre8asite, and my view on it is still the same, I think the professional webmasters should do their best to make sure their sites validate, it&#039;s you guys who set the example for us mere hobbyists and if the professionals&#039; sites don&#039;t validate, what incentive is there for the rest of us to help Yuri Improve the Web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Joe.  Being someone who is new to web design, accessibility and validating code, I admit to being a little obsessive about validating my pages, not every day, but after every update or change.  I posted about this at Cre8asite, and my view on it is still the same, I think the professional webmasters should do their best to make sure their sites validate, it&#8217;s you guys who set the example for us mere hobbyists and if the professionals&#8217; sites don&#8217;t validate, what incentive is there for the rest of us to help Yuri Improve the&nbsp;Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Very good point of view, Joe. Personally I don&#039;t get carried away any more that makes me feel good (I do very much enjoy the challenge). I allow some stuff to slide, but very little. I do validate every time I make edits to one of my sites. I do this because I find it&#039;s easier to keep up with it if I do it right away. It&#039;s not daunting that way. Plus, if my code is valid and whatnot, I can rest easy knowing that the original design won&#039;t be broken or inaccessible to some user because I created a critical (to their UA) error. Moreover, because some newer developers do look at what I do and consider some of it exemplary, I sort of feel I have an obligation to them to keep my pages valid. Last thing I want is someone pointing out to me that I have an invalid page. Thus, I try to check and have it corrected before someone else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point of view, Joe. Personally I don&#8217;t get carried away any more that makes me feel good (I do very much enjoy the challenge). I allow some stuff to slide, but very little. I do validate every time I make edits to one of my sites. I do this because I find it&#8217;s easier to keep up with it if I do it right away. It&#8217;s not daunting that way. Plus, if my code is valid and whatnot, I can rest easy knowing that the original design won&#8217;t be broken or inaccessible to some user because I created a critical (to their UA) error. Moreover, because some newer developers do look at what I do and consider some of it exemplary, I sort of feel I have an obligation to them to keep my pages valid. Last thing I want is someone pointing out to me that I have an invalid page. Thus, I try to check and have it corrected before someone else&nbsp;does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>And, for what it&#039;s worth, I don&#039;t think I was making a Manichean argument.  I simply meant that web standards, while important, are not necessarily the final word in a good website.  And I do NOT in any way think that an alt tag is unimportant - my precise statement was that a missing alt tag will not &quot;invalidate all your labor&quot; - that is, a mistake does not mean you haven&#039;t worked hard.  It DOES mean that it needs to be fixed - I would not call a website accessible which was missing an alt attribute.  I would, however, give that person due credit for their work.  

And sorry, &quot;unescaped&quot; is the wrong word - I meant that I have found copyright symbols cropping up without the proper html entity references.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, for what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t think I was making a Manichean argument.  I simply meant that web standards, while important, are not necessarily the final word in a good website.  And I do NOT in any way think that an alt tag is unimportant - my precise statement was that a missing alt tag will not &#8220;invalidate all your labor&#8221; - that is, a mistake does not mean you haven&#8217;t worked hard.  It DOES mean that it needs to be fixed - I would not call a website accessible which was missing an alt attribute.  I would, however, give that person due credit for their&nbsp;work.  </p>
<p>And sorry, &#8220;unescaped&#8221; is the wrong word - I meant that I have found copyright symbols cropping up without the proper html entity&nbsp;references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-18</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isnâ€™t a Manichean argument. You can fix your writing and also add your <code>alt</code> text, the latter of which is more important than you think (and more important than a single unencoded&nbsp;ampersand).</p>
<p>By the way, how can a copyright symbol be&nbsp;â€œunescapedâ€??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnikwÃ¼rze - Design &#38; Webstandards Podcast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; TechnikwÃ¼rze 28 - Surfen mit Candice besser?</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnikwÃ¼rze - Design &#38; Webstandards Podcast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; TechnikwÃ¼rze 28 - Surfen mit Candice besser?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Dolson: Being Obsessive about Web Standards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Dolson: Being Obsessive about Web Standards&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; TechnikwÃ¼rze #28 &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; TechnikwÃ¼rze #28 &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Dolson: Â»Being Obsessive about Web StandardsÂ« [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Dolson: Â»Being Obsessive about Web StandardsÂ«&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I certainly can\&#039;t argue - I won\&#039;t claim to be innocent of obsessive validation myself.  

I do sincerely enjoy the detailed and nitpicky elements of accessible design and some parts of SEO.  My argument is more to the point that sometimes it\&#039;s important to step back and make sure the whole website is really providing what you need from it. 

For some of us, a website really needs to provide a place for us to exercise our nitpicky tendencies :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly can&#39;t argue - I won&#39;t claim to be innocent of obsessive validation&nbsp;myself.  </p>
<p>I do sincerely enjoy the detailed and nitpicky elements of accessible design and some parts of SEO.  My argument is more to the point that sometimes it&#39;s important to step back and make sure the whole website is really providing what you need from&nbsp;it. </p>
<p>For some of us, a website really needs to provide a place for us to exercise our nitpicky tendencies <img src='http://www.joedolson.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Some of us do ENJOY the complexity of accessibility - accessible website design and SEO is the only thing that keeps me interested in web design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us do ENJOY the complexity of accessibility - accessible website design and SEO is the only thing that keeps me interested in web&nbsp;design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

