<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Obsessive about Web Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Cath!  Nice to see you showing up here, as well!

It's tough to keep up, I know - but the important thing, to my mind, is to keep trying.  Even though it's possible that some people will hold one or two errors against you, you should always know that THOSE people are just being obnoxious - you know the work you've put in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Cath!  Nice to see you showing up here, as well!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough to keep up, I know - but the important thing, to my mind, is to keep trying.  Even though it&#8217;s possible that some people will hold one or two errors against you, you should always know that THOSE people are just being obnoxious - you know the work you&#8217;ve put&nbsp;in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>Cath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>Good article Joe.  Being someone who is new to web design, accessibility and validating code, I admit to being a little obsessive about validating my pages, not every day, but after every update or change.  I posted about this at Cre8asite, and my view on it is still the same, I think the professional webmasters should do their best to make sure their sites validate, it's you guys who set the example for us mere hobbyists and if the professionals' sites don't validate, what incentive is there for the rest of us to help Yuri Improve the Web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Joe.  Being someone who is new to web design, accessibility and validating code, I admit to being a little obsessive about validating my pages, not every day, but after every update or change.  I posted about this at Cre8asite, and my view on it is still the same, I think the professional webmasters should do their best to make sure their sites validate, it&#8217;s you guys who set the example for us mere hobbyists and if the professionals&#8217; sites don&#8217;t validate, what incentive is there for the rest of us to help Yuri Improve the&nbsp;Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Very good point of view, Joe. Personally I don't get carried away any more that makes me feel good (I do very much enjoy the challenge). I allow some stuff to slide, but very little. I do validate every time I make edits to one of my sites. I do this because I find it's easier to keep up with it if I do it right away. It's not daunting that way. Plus, if my code is valid and whatnot, I can rest easy knowing that the original design won't be broken or inaccessible to some user because I created a critical (to their UA) error. Moreover, because some newer developers do look at what I do and consider some of it exemplary, I sort of feel I have an obligation to them to keep my pages valid. Last thing I want is someone pointing out to me that I have an invalid page. Thus, I try to check and have it corrected before someone else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point of view, Joe. Personally I don&#8217;t get carried away any more that makes me feel good (I do very much enjoy the challenge). I allow some stuff to slide, but very little. I do validate every time I make edits to one of my sites. I do this because I find it&#8217;s easier to keep up with it if I do it right away. It&#8217;s not daunting that way. Plus, if my code is valid and whatnot, I can rest easy knowing that the original design won&#8217;t be broken or inaccessible to some user because I created a critical (to their UA) error. Moreover, because some newer developers do look at what I do and consider some of it exemplary, I sort of feel I have an obligation to them to keep my pages valid. Last thing I want is someone pointing out to me that I have an invalid page. Thus, I try to check and have it corrected before someone else&nbsp;does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>And, for what it's worth, I don't think I was making a Manichean argument.  I simply meant that web standards, while important, are not necessarily the final word in a good website.  And I do NOT in any way think that an alt tag is unimportant - my precise statement was that a missing alt tag will not "invalidate all your labor" - that is, a mistake does not mean you haven't worked hard.  It DOES mean that it needs to be fixed - I would not call a website accessible which was missing an alt attribute.  I would, however, give that person due credit for their work.  

And sorry, "unescaped" is the wrong word - I meant that I have found copyright symbols cropping up without the proper html entity references.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, for what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t think I was making a Manichean argument.  I simply meant that web standards, while important, are not necessarily the final word in a good website.  And I do NOT in any way think that an alt tag is unimportant - my precise statement was that a missing alt tag will not &#8220;invalidate all your labor&#8221; - that is, a mistake does not mean you haven&#8217;t worked hard.  It DOES mean that it needs to be fixed - I would not call a website accessible which was missing an alt attribute.  I would, however, give that person due credit for their work.  </p>
<p>And sorry, &#8220;unescaped&#8221; is the wrong word - I meant that I have found copyright symbols cropping up without the proper <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> entity&nbsp;references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>This isn’t a Manichean argument. You can fix your writing and also add your &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; text, the latter of which is more important than you think (and more important than a single unencoded ampersand).

By the way, how can a copyright symbol be “unescaped”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn’t a Manichean argument. You can fix your writing and also add your <code>alt</code> text, the latter of which is more important than you think (and more important than a single unencoded ampersand).</p>
<p>By the way, how can a copyright symbol be&nbsp;“unescaped”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technikwürze - Design &#38; Webstandards Podcast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Technikwürze 28 - Surfen mit Candice besser?</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Technikwürze - Design &#38; Webstandards Podcast &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Technikwürze 28 - Surfen mit Candice besser?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Dolson: Being Obsessive about Web Standards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Dolson: Being Obsessive about Web Standards&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Technikwürze #28 &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Technikwürze #28 &#8212; cne _LOG Archiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Dolson: »Being Obsessive about Web Standards« [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Dolson: »Being Obsessive about Web Standards«&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I certainly can\'t argue - I won\'t claim to be innocent of obsessive validation myself.  

I do sincerely enjoy the detailed and nitpicky elements of accessible design and some parts of SEO.  My argument is more to the point that sometimes it\'s important to step back and make sure the whole website is really providing what you need from it. 

For some of us, a website really needs to provide a place for us to exercise our nitpicky tendencies :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly can&#39;t argue - I won&#39;t claim to be innocent of obsessive validation myself.  </p>
<p>I do sincerely enjoy the detailed and nitpicky elements of accessible design and some parts of SEO.  My argument is more to the point that sometimes it&#39;s important to step back and make sure the whole website is really providing what you need from it. </p>
<p>For some of us, a website really needs to provide a place for us to exercise our nitpicky tendencies&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/06/being-obsessive-about-web-standards/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Some of us do ENJOY the complexity of accessibility - accessible website design and SEO is the only thing that keeps me interested in web design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us do ENJOY the complexity of accessibility - accessible website design and SEO is the only thing that keeps me interested in web&nbsp;design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
