<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Describing a Semantic Calendar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fahed</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16984</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16984</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the&nbsp;feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16982</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16982</guid>
		<description>A definition list is appropriate for any data which is fundamentally a "call and response"/"question and answer" information set. As such, what you're describing seems like it would be perfectly appropriate. 

I have to say that I think a table would be perfectly acceptable, as well, of course. Semantics aren't really a fixed feature: for complex data sets, there are commonly multiple appropriate solutions. I could go either way on this particular question!

It's important not to worry too much about whether you've chosen the "right" answer in semantics. Basically, you can always choose to use the wrong element --- but choosing the right one is much more difficult. 

If you can explain your reasoning for a specific element choice from a semantic perspective, you're fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A definition list is appropriate for any data which is fundamentally a &#8220;call and response&#8221;/&#8221;question and answer&#8221; information set. As such, what you&#8217;re describing seems like it would be perfectly appropriate. </p>
<p>I have to say that I think a table would be perfectly acceptable, as well, of course. Semantics aren&#8217;t really a fixed feature: for complex data sets, there are commonly multiple appropriate solutions. I could go either way on this particular question!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important not to worry too much about whether you&#8217;ve chosen the &#8220;right&#8221; answer in semantics. Basically, you can always choose to use the wrong element&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- but choosing the right one is much more difficult. </p>
<p>If you can explain your reasoning for a specific element choice from a semantic perspective, you&#8217;re&nbsp;fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fahed</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16978</link>
		<dc:creator>Fahed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/describing-a-semantic-calendar/#comment-16978</guid>
		<description>We are putting together a list of features in a specific area of our site in which each feature has its own html page and all of the features together, however, are presented on an "overview" page.

The immediate approach was to put this together as a table in which the headers were "Feature" &#38; "Benefit", but came to the conclusion that this is not tabular data and that, being a list of features &#38; summarised benefit, it would be more semantically correct to present them as a list. 

We have never used definition lists before and are not sure whether this would be the right place to use them.

So we would have, as an example, dt of 'speed' with a dl of 'so you can get from a to b in time for dinner'. Would this be correct and, if so, what about what we would have used as table headers (i.e. feature &#38; benefit) - do they also fall in this category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are putting together a list of features in a specific area of our site in which each feature has its own <acronym title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> page and all of the features together, however, are presented on an &#8220;overview&#8221; page.</p>
<p>The immediate approach was to put this together as a table in which the headers were &#8220;Feature&#8221; <span class="amp">&amp;</span> &#8220;Benefit&#8221;, but came to the conclusion that this is not tabular data and that, being a list of features <span class="amp">&amp;</span> summarised benefit, it would be more semantically correct to present them as a list. </p>
<p>We have never used definition lists before and are not sure whether this would be the right place to use them.</p>
<p>So we would have, as an example, dt of &#8216;speed&#8217; with a dl of &#8216;so you can get from a to b in time for dinner&#8217;. Would this be correct and, if so, what about what we would have used as table headers (i.e. feature <span class="amp">&amp;</span> benefit) - do they also fall in this&nbsp;category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
