<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New post at Accessibility Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-19507</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-19507</guid>
		<description>Because I didn't feel it contributed to the discussion. No offense, but you really didn't say anything! I'm not fond of comments which don't really provide any meaningful dialogue. 

Bluntly, if somebody comes by a year-old post and drops a comments which says (and I quote) "interesting information. I like it. You have a talent as a journalist," I'm inclined to doubt the faithfulness of the comment. 

Had that comment been left on a post which actually contained any kind of journalistic content, or had it in any way indicated any real correlation to any article on the site, I probably would have left it. Instead, frankly, it looked very much like automated spam.

Clearly, since you've revisited, it's not automated spam, and I apologize for the assumption --- but when you receive hundreds of spam attacks per day, you tend to assume the worst. 

I hope you'll accept my apology for removing your comment --- and I hope you'll come back and contribute again later.

Best,
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I didn&#8217;t feel it contributed to the discussion. No offense, but you really didn&#8217;t say anything! I&#8217;m not fond of comments which don&#8217;t really provide any meaningful dialogue. </p>
<p>Bluntly, if somebody comes by a year-old post and drops a comments which says (and I quote) &#8220;interesting information. I like it. You have a talent as a journalist,&#8221; I&#8217;m inclined to doubt the faithfulness of the comment. </p>
<p>Had that comment been left on a post which actually contained any kind of journalistic content, or had it in any way indicated any real correlation to any article on the site, I probably would have left it. Instead, frankly, it looked very much like automated spam.</p>
<p>Clearly, since you&#8217;ve revisited, it&#8217;s not automated spam, and I apologize for the assumption&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- but when you receive hundreds of spam attacks per day, you tend to assume the worst. </p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;ll accept my apology for removing your comment&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- and I hope you&#8217;ll come back and contribute again later.</p>
<p>Best,&nbsp;Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-19481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-19481</guid>
		<description>Why did you delete my previous post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you delete my previous&nbsp;post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2006/10/new-post-at-accessibility-blog/#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I placed a comment over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I placed a comment over&nbsp;there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
