<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-22586</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-22586</guid>
		<description>Interesting article with good points

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article with good points&nbsp;Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Importance of Validation</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-12240</link>
		<dc:creator>Importance of Validation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-12240</guid>
		<description>[...] of Validation   Here's a few good articles on the subject  Validation alone is not enough  Beyond Validation and a quote   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of Validation   Here&#8217;s a few good articles on the subject  Validation alone is not enough  Beyond Validation and a quote&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedGoas.com - &#187; Creating Websites with Web Standards In Mind, Sometimes</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>TedGoas.com - &#187; Creating Websites with Web Standards In Mind, Sometimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Dolson does a good job of explaining both of these scenarios in more detail. These standards have been around for years; those in the web community have had ample time to get their act together. The overall trend reveals that web developers just don&#8217;t care enough to adhere to these standard recommendations set forth. (The study I refer to was personally conducted as part of a graduate research thesis.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Dolson does a good job of explaining both of these scenarios in more detail. These standards have been around for years; those in the web community have had ample time to get their act together. The overall trend reveals that web developers just don&#8217;t care enough to adhere to these standard recommendations set forth. (The study I refer to was personally conducted as part of a graduate research thesis.)&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10538</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10538</guid>
		<description>A List Apart released an article that talks about the power of validation etc
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/whereourstandardswentwrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A List Apart released an article that talks about the power of validation etc&nbsp;<a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/whereourstandardswentwrong">http://www.alistapart.com/articles/whereourstandardswentwrong</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10377</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10377</guid>
		<description>Ah, comments...no, I didn't get around to that... 

Another time! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, comments&#8230;no, I didn&#8217;t get around to that&#8230; </p>
<p>Another time!&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10329</guid>
		<description>Yeah Its not easy but it is a good learning curve especially for clients and customers in the future. because if you can 'sell' these practices to people stuck in their old ways, you will be able to do it to customers and clients who do not have a clue.

BTW thanks for reading my posts (didn't see any comments though :P )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Its not easy but it is a good learning curve especially for clients and customers in the future. because if you can &#8216;sell&#8217; these practices to people stuck in their old ways, you will be able to do it to customers and clients who do not have a clue.</p>
<p><acronym title="By The Way">BTW</acronym> thanks for reading my posts (didn&#8217;t see any comments though :P&nbsp;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10265</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10265</guid>
		<description>It looks like you're in a bit of an awkward situation, Jermayn!  (I read a few of your other posts, as well.) It can be difficult being in a place where you, as the junior developer, are trying to implement modern, standards-based ideas when all the senior developers are stuck in the late 1990's.  My advice: deal with it and move on.  The experience will be valuable to you regardless of whether you're able to guide the project on the best possible path.

As to your article, you're right - specific doctypes make a huge difference. That's one of the key points to this article, itself. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;re in a bit of an awkward situation, Jermayn!  (I read a few of your other posts, as well.) It can be difficult being in a place where you, as the junior developer, are trying to implement modern, standards-based ideas when all the senior developers are stuck in the late 1990&#8217;s.  My advice: deal with it and move on.  The experience will be valuable to you regardless of whether you&#8217;re able to guide the project on the best possible path.</p>
<p>As to your article, you&#8217;re right - specific doctypes make a huge difference. That&#8217;s one of the key points to this article, itself.&nbsp;Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-10159</guid>
		<description>I have also like Aiden just posted a similar post about validation, titled "&lt;a href="http://germworks.net/blog/2007/02/23/different-doctypes-and-do-they-matter-for-standards/"&gt;Different Doctypes and Do They Matter for Standards?&lt;/a&gt;

Reason I posted about it is because I am in the middle of placing content in a new government designed website that uses a transitional doctype and has been sold by the original creators as AAA accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also like Aiden just posted a similar post about validation, titled &#8220;<a href="http://germworks.net/blog/2007/02/23/different-doctypes-and-do-they-matter-for-standards/">Different Doctypes and Do They Matter for Standards?</a></p>
<p>Reason I posted about it is because I am in the middle of placing content in a new government designed website that uses a transitional doctype and has been sold by the original creators as AAA&nbsp;accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-9595</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>Well, that's interesting, Aiden.  Unfortunately, you do seem to have missed my point entirely.  I didn't claim in any way that validation wasn't &lt;em&gt;important&lt;/em&gt;, as you're saying in your article.  I stated that validation isn't the most critical, most valuable part of website development you can focus on.  

I've never said in any way that a page shouldn't make a point to validate - it simply shouldn't interpret that validation as any kind of indicator that they've accomplished the job of creating a high-quality web page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s interesting, Aiden.  Unfortunately, you do seem to have missed my point entirely.  I didn&#8217;t claim in any way that validation wasn&#8217;t <em>important</em>, as you&#8217;re saying in your article.  I stated that validation isn&#8217;t the most critical, most valuable part of website development you can focus on.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never said in any way that a page shouldn&#8217;t make a point to validate - it simply shouldn&#8217;t interpret that validation as any kind of indicator that they&#8217;ve accomplished the job of creating a high-quality web&nbsp;page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aiden</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>Aiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/beyond-validation/#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>I just wrote up a post about validation myself, along with a look at the Top 50 on Alexa and their results on validation. Take a peek, it's pretty interesting.

&lt;a href="http://www.thesleepingpoint.com/article.php?id=8" rel="nofollow"&gt;Validation, What Is It Good For?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrote up a post about validation myself, along with a look at the Top 50 on Alexa and their results on validation. Take a peek, it&#8217;s pretty interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesleepingpoint.com/article.php?id=8">Validation, What Is It Good&nbsp;For?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
