<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantic formatting for interviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Accessibility (and not always on topic.)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-9755</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-9755</guid>
		<description>I think definition lists are fine for simple interviews - it's when it comes to multi-person conversations that I think they're weak. They don't really support the threading that's necessary for more complicated interviews.

I'll admit, though, that this article could be better written. I missed some obvious possibilities and didn't always make my point that clear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think definition lists are fine for simple interviews - it&#8217;s when it comes to multi-person conversations that I think they&#8217;re weak. They don&#8217;t really support the threading that&#8217;s necessary for more complicated interviews.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit, though, that this article could be better written. I missed some obvious possibilities and didn&#8217;t always make my point that&nbsp;clear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-9720</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-9720</guid>
		<description>I have run a couple of interviews and used dl/dt/dd there. It seems quite reasonable and semantically correct. If you have read the DL specification, you'd see that its use is fairly broad and is not limited to simple term/def lists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have run a couple of interviews and used dl/dt/dd there. It seems quite reasonable and semantically correct. If you have read the DL specification, you&#8217;d see that its use is fairly broad and is not limited to simple term/def&nbsp;lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  That's a damn good point.  For some reason I never think of nesting block level elements - tend to forget you can do that.

I think I'll revise this article, actually...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  That&#8217;s a damn good point.  For some reason I never think of nesting block level elements - tend to forget you can do that.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll revise this article,&nbsp;actually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/01/semantic-formatting-for-interviews/#comment-5625</guid>
		<description>Curious, but wouldn't employing blockquotes with a leading cite within the answering DD be even better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious, but wouldn&#8217;t employing blockquotes with a leading cite within the answering DD be even&nbsp;better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
