<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to do about the most popular posts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely critical to disable it while working on a site...it can be REALLY annoying in that circumstance.  When you&#039;re getting heavy traffic, though, it can be helpful to reduce server load.  Significantly reduces the amount of work the server has to do, since it only needs to re-render the page as frequently as you tell it to.

But if you have to work on a blog where you don&#039;t have access to disable it...ouch.  That would really suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely critical to disable it while working on a site&#8230;it can be REALLY annoying in that circumstance.  When you&#8217;re getting heavy traffic, though, it can be helpful to reduce server load.  Significantly reduces the amount of work the server has to do, since it only needs to re-render the page as frequently as you tell it&nbsp;to.</p>
<p>But if you have to work on a blog where you don&#8217;t have access to disable it&#8230;ouch.  That would really&nbsp;suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-9425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9425</guid>
		<description>I despise that wp-cache plugin. I was trying to work on a theme for someone&#039;s blog and they had that installed. Every time I made an edit I had to find a fresh page to check so I could actually see the change. it was most annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I despise that wp-cache plugin. I was trying to work on a theme for someone&#8217;s blog and they had that installed. Every time I made an edit I had to find a fresh page to check so I could actually see the change. it was most&nbsp;annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson Accessible Web Design &#124; Those pesky most popular posts</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson Accessible Web Design &#124; Those pesky most popular posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s the issue of popularity. As I commented previously, I&#8217;m not really all that happy with the self-defining nature of popular posts. Once popular, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] there&#8217;s the issue of popularity. As I commented previously, I&#8217;m not really all that happy with the self-defining nature of popular posts. Once popular,&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-9060</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9060</guid>
		<description>I like the randomized array from the top 50 idea...although I&#039;ve also come to realize another problem with the plugin I&#039;m using right now...the fact that I also use the wp-cache plugin causes some serious discrepancies between actual views and the numbers recorded.  

I&#039;ve realized that the array is in fact completely inauthentic.

I think I may aim for a top 50 &lt;em&gt;selected&lt;/em&gt; posts, instead.  No reason not to wield some editorial control, after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the randomized array from the top 50 idea&#8230;although I&#8217;ve also come to realize another problem with the plugin I&#8217;m using right now&#8230;the fact that I also use the wp-cache plugin causes some serious discrepancies between actual views and the numbers&nbsp;recorded.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve realized that the array is in fact completely&nbsp;inauthentic.</p>
<p>I think I may aim for a top 50 <em>selected</em> posts, instead.  No reason not to wield some editorial control, after&nbsp;all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-9055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9055</guid>
		<description>You could create an array of, say, the top 50 then randomize those in shots of ten. Maybe. I do understand what you&#039;re saying... once they&#039;re displayed as popular posts curiosity will keep them that way. 

Another idea, which I did myself --- got it from Zeldman --- is to do a year-end recap which gives them a second life albeit for a short period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could create an array of, say, the top 50 then randomize those in shots of ten. Maybe. I do understand what you&#8217;re saying&#8230; once they&#8217;re displayed as popular posts curiosity will keep them that&nbsp;way. </p>
<p>Another idea, which I did myself&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- got it from Zeldman&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- is to do a year-end recap which gives them a second life albeit for a short&nbsp;period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>Hidden treasures would be good, if I rewrote the select query to eliminate recent posts.  Seems a bit fair to call recent posts &quot;hidden.&quot;  Hmmmm...thanks for the suggestions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden treasures would be good, if I rewrote the select query to eliminate recent posts.  Seems a bit fair to call recent posts &#8220;hidden.&#8221;  Hmmmm&#8230;thanks for the&nbsp;suggestions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-8543</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8543</guid>
		<description>Sadly neglected posts?
Unloved orphan posts?
How about...
Hidden Treasures?

Tom :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly neglected posts?<br />
Unloved orphan posts?<br />
How about&#8230;<br />
Hidden&nbsp;Treasures?</p>
<p>Tom <img src='http://www.joedolson.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve decided to put up my 10 least popular posts for a while.  Many of these are actually just my &lt;em&gt;most recent&lt;/em&gt; posts, so I&#039;m not sure that &quot;Unpopular&quot; is really appropriate...

Any suggestions for a different way of labeling this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to put up my 10 least popular posts for a while.  Many of these are actually just my <em>most recent</em> posts, so I&#8217;m not sure that &#8220;Unpopular&#8221; is really&nbsp;appropriate&#8230;</p>
<p>Any suggestions for a different way of labeling&nbsp;this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

