<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to do about the most popular posts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>It's definitely critical to disable it while working on a site...it can be REALLY annoying in that circumstance.  When you're getting heavy traffic, though, it can be helpful to reduce server load.  Significantly reduces the amount of work the server has to do, since it only needs to re-render the page as frequently as you tell it to.

But if you have to work on a blog where you don't have access to disable it...ouch.  That would really suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely critical to disable it while working on a site&#8230;it can be REALLY annoying in that circumstance.  When you&#8217;re getting heavy traffic, though, it can be helpful to reduce server load.  Significantly reduces the amount of work the server has to do, since it only needs to re-render the page as frequently as you tell it to.</p>
<p>But if you have to work on a blog where you don&#8217;t have access to disable it&#8230;ouch.  That would really&nbsp;suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9425</guid>
		<description>I despise that wp-cache plugin. I was trying to work on a theme for someone's blog and they had that installed. Every time I made an edit I had to find a fresh page to check so I could actually see the change. it was most annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I despise that wp-cache plugin. I was trying to work on a theme for someone&#8217;s blog and they had that installed. Every time I made an edit I had to find a fresh page to check so I could actually see the change. it was most&nbsp;annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson Accessible Web Design &#124; Those pesky most popular posts</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson Accessible Web Design &#124; Those pesky most popular posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s the issue of popularity. As I commented previously, I&#8217;m not really all that happy with the self-defining nature of popular posts. Once popular, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] there&#8217;s the issue of popularity. As I commented previously, I&#8217;m not really all that happy with the self-defining nature of popular posts. Once popular,&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9060</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9060</guid>
		<description>I like the randomized array from the top 50 idea...although I've also come to realize another problem with the plugin I'm using right now...the fact that I also use the wp-cache plugin causes some serious discrepancies between actual views and the numbers recorded.  

I've realized that the array is in fact completely inauthentic.

I think I may aim for a top 50 &lt;em&gt;selected&lt;/em&gt; posts, instead.  No reason not to wield some editorial control, after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the randomized array from the top 50 idea&#8230;although I&#8217;ve also come to realize another problem with the plugin I&#8217;m using right now&#8230;the fact that I also use the wp-cache plugin causes some serious discrepancies between actual views and the numbers recorded.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve realized that the array is in fact completely inauthentic.</p>
<p>I think I may aim for a top 50 <em>selected</em> posts, instead.  No reason not to wield some editorial control, after&nbsp;all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-9055</guid>
		<description>You could create an array of, say, the top 50 then randomize those in shots of ten. Maybe. I do understand what you're saying... once they're displayed as popular posts curiosity will keep them that way. 

Another idea, which I did myself --- got it from Zeldman --- is to do a year-end recap which gives them a second life albeit for a short period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could create an array of, say, the top 50 then randomize those in shots of ten. Maybe. I do understand what you&#8217;re saying&#8230; once they&#8217;re displayed as popular posts curiosity will keep them that way. </p>
<p>Another idea, which I did myself&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- got it from Zeldman&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- is to do a year-end recap which gives them a second life albeit for a short&nbsp;period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>Hidden treasures would be good, if I rewrote the select query to eliminate recent posts.  Seems a bit fair to call recent posts "hidden."  Hmmmm...thanks for the suggestions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden treasures would be good, if I rewrote the select query to eliminate recent posts.  Seems a bit fair to call recent posts &#8220;hidden.&#8221;  Hmmmm&#8230;thanks for the&nbsp;suggestions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8543</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8543</guid>
		<description>Sadly neglected posts?
Unloved orphan posts?
How about...
Hidden Treasures?

Tom :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly neglected posts?<br />
Unloved orphan posts?<br />
How about&#8230;<br />
Hidden Treasures?</p>
<p>Tom&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/what-to-do-about-the-most-popular-posts/#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>I've decided to put up my 10 least popular posts for a while.  Many of these are actually just my &lt;em&gt;most recent&lt;/em&gt; posts, so I'm not sure that "Unpopular" is really appropriate...

Any suggestions for a different way of labeling this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to put up my 10 least popular posts for a while.  Many of these are actually just my <em>most recent</em> posts, so I&#8217;m not sure that &#8220;Unpopular&#8221; is really appropriate&#8230;</p>
<p>Any suggestions for a different way of labeling&nbsp;this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
