<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When to Incorporate Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10864</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10864</guid>
		<description>What is it that makes you need static pages?  Wordpress is definitely the one I use the most, but it doesn&#039;t produce static pages.  Using the wp-cache plugin you can reduce the server burden and slow down commensurate with high traffic, but it isn&#039;t really creating static pages.

You can use &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmsmatrix.org/&quot;&gt;the CMS matrix&lt;/a&gt; to comb through a wide variety of options and try and find exactly the tool you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it that makes you need static pages?  WordPress is definitely the one I use the most, but it doesn&#8217;t produce static pages.  Using the wp-cache plugin you can reduce the server burden and slow down commensurate with high traffic, but it isn&#8217;t really creating static&nbsp;pages.</p>
<p>You can use <a href="http://cmsmatrix.org/">the <abbr title="Content Management System">CMS</abbr> matrix</a> to comb through a wide variety of options and try and find exactly the tool you&nbsp;want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Laks</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Laks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>Do you recommend any specific CMS?  Specifically ones that can generate static pages...  I&#039;m torn between hand making static pages to try and rank well, and speeding up the process with a cms, though the output might not be as accessible.  I guess what I am looking for is the holy grail, free open source cms with static output.  Wishful thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you recommend any specific <abbr title="Content Management System">CMS</abbr>?  Specifically ones that can generate static pages&#8230;  I&#8217;m torn between hand making static pages to try and rank well, and speeding up the process with a cms, though the output might not be as accessible.  I guess what I am looking for is the holy grail, free open source cms with static output.  Wishful&nbsp;thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>I &lt;em&gt;wish&lt;/em&gt; that was a &quot;most of the time&quot; sort of thing.  However, I&#039;ve had no shortage of experience with projects where they wanted to keep the existing content, organization, and design but convert it to an accessible website.

Personally, I find it to be a kind of fun little puzzle --- how to reproduce a design which was built in 16 nested tables using semantic CSS.  

Nonetheless, from a cost analysis perspective, it&#039;s not necessarily the most efficient way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <em>wish</em> that was a &#8220;most of the time&#8221; sort of thing.  However, I&#8217;ve had no shortage of experience with projects where they wanted to keep the existing content, organization, and design but convert it to an accessible&nbsp;website.</p>
<p>Personally, I find it to be a kind of fun little puzzle&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- how to reproduce a design which was built in 16 nested tables using semantic&nbsp;<abbr title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</abbr>.  </p>
<p>Nonetheless, from a cost analysis perspective, it&#8217;s not necessarily the most efficient way to&nbsp;go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10498</guid>
		<description>That is true but most of the time when this happens, your doing a whole new re-design of the website and so you get a chance to &#039;start a-fresh&#039; in a sense anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true but most of the time when this happens, your doing a whole new re-design of the website and so you get a chance to &#8216;start a-fresh&#8217; in a sense&nbsp;anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10380</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10380</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - it&#039;s not a big deal to &lt;em&gt;subtly&lt;/em&gt; change a file.  But in many retrofitting projects the changes which need to happen go well beyond a subtle change.  Altering the output of a content management system, completely changing the coding style and format...these can be very substantial changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right - it&#8217;s not a big deal to <em>subtly</em> change a file.  But in many retrofitting projects the changes which need to happen go well beyond a subtle change.  Altering the output of a content management system, completely changing the coding style and format&#8230;these can be very substantial&nbsp;changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10337</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or do people make a big deal out of this when realistically its not that big a deal to subtly change the file? Most of the time, I find I change and fiddle with the file more for the actual client&#039;s needs than for accessibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or do people make a big deal out of this when realistically its not that big a deal to subtly change the file? Most of the time, I find I change and fiddle with the file more for the actual client&#8217;s needs than for&nbsp;accessibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

