<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When to Incorporate Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10864</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10864</guid>
		<description>What is it that makes you need static pages?  Wordpress is definitely the one I use the most, but it doesn't produce static pages.  Using the wp-cache plugin you can reduce the server burden and slow down commensurate with high traffic, but it isn't really creating static pages.

You can use &lt;a href="http://cmsmatrix.org/"&gt;the CMS matrix&lt;/a&gt; to comb through a wide variety of options and try and find exactly the tool you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it that makes you need static pages?  Wordpress is definitely the one I use the most, but it doesn&#8217;t produce static pages.  Using the wp-cache plugin you can reduce the server burden and slow down commensurate with high traffic, but it isn&#8217;t really creating static pages.</p>
<p>You can use <a href="http://cmsmatrix.org/">the <acronym title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym> matrix</a> to comb through a wide variety of options and try and find exactly the tool you&nbsp;want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Laks</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Laks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>Do you recommend any specific CMS?  Specifically ones that can generate static pages...  I'm torn between hand making static pages to try and rank well, and speeding up the process with a cms, though the output might not be as accessible.  I guess what I am looking for is the holy grail, free open source cms with static output.  Wishful thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you recommend any specific <acronym title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym>?  Specifically ones that can generate static pages&#8230;  I&#8217;m torn between hand making static pages to try and rank well, and speeding up the process with a <acronym title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym>, though the output might not be as accessible.  I guess what I am looking for is the holy grail, free open source <acronym title="Content Management System">CMS</acronym> with static output.  Wishful&nbsp;thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>I &lt;em&gt;wish&lt;/em&gt; that was a "most of the time" sort of thing.  However, I've had no shortage of experience with projects where they wanted to keep the existing content, organization, and design but convert it to an accessible website.

Personally, I find it to be a kind of fun little puzzle --- how to reproduce a design which was built in 16 nested tables using semantic CSS.  

Nonetheless, from a cost analysis perspective, it's not necessarily the most efficient way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <em>wish</em> that was a &#8220;most of the time&#8221; sort of thing.  However, I&#8217;ve had no shortage of experience with projects where they wanted to keep the existing content, organization, and design but convert it to an accessible website.</p>
<p>Personally, I find it to be a kind of fun little puzzle&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- how to reproduce a design which was built in 16 nested tables using semantic <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym>.  </p>
<p>Nonetheless, from a cost analysis perspective, it&#8217;s not necessarily the most efficient way to&nbsp;go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10498</guid>
		<description>That is true but most of the time when this happens, your doing a whole new re-design of the website and so you get a chance to 'start a-fresh' in a sense anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true but most of the time when this happens, your doing a whole new re-design of the website and so you get a chance to &#8216;start a-fresh&#8217; in a sense&nbsp;anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10380</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10380</guid>
		<description>You're right - it's not a big deal to &lt;em&gt;subtly&lt;/em&gt; change a file.  But in many retrofitting projects the changes which need to happen go well beyond a subtle change.  Altering the output of a content management system, completely changing the coding style and format...these can be very substantial changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right - it&#8217;s not a big deal to <em>subtly</em> change a file.  But in many retrofitting projects the changes which need to happen go well beyond a subtle change.  Altering the output of a content management system, completely changing the coding style and format&#8230;these can be very substantial&nbsp;changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/02/when-to-incorporate-accessibility/#comment-10337</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or do people make a big deal out of this when realistically its not that big a deal to subtly change the file? Most of the time, I find I change and fiddle with the file more for the actual client's needs than for accessibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or do people make a big deal out of this when realistically its not that big a deal to subtly change the file? Most of the time, I find I change and fiddle with the file more for the actual client&#8217;s needs than for&nbsp;accessibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
