<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Friendly vs. Search Engine Optimized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-40007</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-40007</guid>
		<description>This is a very nice article.  I definitely agree with #5 5. An Optimized site is the result of extensive research. It requires a statistical basis which keeps track of user behavior. A Friendly site is the result of technical expertise which takes into careful consideration the many issues which can get in the way of optimization.  You couldn&#039;t have said it any better.  Keep it up.

Stacey Renee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice article.  I definitely agree with #5 5. An Optimized site is the result of extensive research. It requires a statistical basis which keeps track of user behavior. A Friendly site is the result of technical expertise which takes into careful consideration the many issues which can get in the way of optimization.  You couldn&#8217;t have said it any better.  Keep it&nbsp;up.</p>
<p>Stacey&nbsp;Renee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-39152</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-39152</guid>
		<description>Very cool, I am just starting to learn about search engine optimization, so I am reading every article I can find, thank you very much for yours.  I will definitely be back to read more

Stacy Renee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool, I am just starting to learn about search engine optimization, so I am reading every article I can find, thank you very much for yours.  I will definitely be back to read&nbsp;more</p>
<p>Stacy&nbsp;Renee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-33455</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-33455</guid>
		<description>From this post, one can say that it is very thin line between optimization and freindlyness. One has to use both these things to get best rankings in google. One should write keyword rich content without compromising natural flow or language. Even the comment section is content rich in this part of blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this post, one can say that it is very thin line between optimization and freindlyness. One has to use both these things to get best rankings in google. One should write keyword rich content without compromising natural flow or language. Even the comment section is content rich in this part of&nbsp;blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sharpe</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32437</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sharpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32437</guid>
		<description>Honestly I think there some semantic hair splitting going on here, if most designers produced SEO friendly sites as an SEO guy id be a very happy man.

Many of the difference you identified are become less imporrtant as the engines start to use more usability stats in there ranking algorythms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly I think there some semantic hair splitting going on here, if most designers produced SEO friendly sites as an SEO guy id be a very happy&nbsp;man.</p>
<p>Many of the difference you identified are become less imporrtant as the engines start to use more usability stats in there ranking&nbsp;algorythms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32302</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32302</guid>
		<description>Getting unfriendly (and duplicated) url&#039;s indexed can sometimes be a difficult task.  This is why making sure there is no duplicate content, and that the URL&#039;s of the website are search engine friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting unfriendly (and duplicated) url&#8217;s indexed can sometimes be a difficult task.  This is why making sure there is no duplicate content, and that the <abbr title="Uniform Resource Locator">URL</abbr>&#8217;s of the website are search engine&nbsp;friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32098</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32098</guid>
		<description>Yes, Shari, it is an arrogant response. I certainly understand that it&#039;s honest; but my first impression is definitely that your response is arrogant. 

I don&#039;t think that I, at any point, indicated the search engine &#039;friendliness&#039; and search engine optimization are &lt;em&gt;separate&lt;/em&gt;. I stated, very clearly, that they are &lt;em&gt;different&lt;/em&gt;. If you are attempting to argue that these are in fact the same thing, then I heartily disagree with you. That&#039;s a gross simplification of how the web works and how projects are developed. 

Being search engine friendly is an aspect of search engine optimization, but it is not inclusive of all aspects of optimization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Shari, it is an arrogant response. I certainly understand that it&#8217;s honest; but my first impression is definitely that your response is&nbsp;arrogant. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that I, at any point, indicated the search engine &#8216;friendliness&#8217; and search engine optimization are <em>separate</em>. I stated, very clearly, that they are <em>different</em>. If you are attempting to argue that these are in fact the same thing, then I heartily disagree with you. That&#8217;s a gross simplification of how the web works and how projects are&nbsp;developed. </p>
<p>Being search engine friendly is an aspect of search engine optimization, but it is not inclusive of all aspects of&nbsp;optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari Thurow</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32096</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari Thurow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32096</guid>
		<description>I must say that I am thoroughly (pun unintentional) disappointed with this article. I do not agree with your or Stoney&#039;s perception of &quot;optimization&quot; vs. &quot;friendly&quot;. And I am the person who originated this topic/field and wrote the first book about it. 

Search-engine friendly design follows the principles of search engine optimization (text, links, popularity/validation, searcher behavior). To separate the two? Ridiculous. 

Search engine optimization is optimizing (which includes writing, coding, scripting, programming, designing, etc.) documents for people who use search engines, both the commercial web search engines and site search engines. Search engine optimization accommodates the wide variety of searcher behaviors, not only querying behavior.

IMHO, it requires knowledge of searchers and search engines. 

Most SEOs, I believe, have a somewhat reasonable understanding of search engines. However, I think the general knowledge of searcher behaviors in the SEO arena, overall, is abysmal. 

That is my first impression of the article. It may seem like a somewhat arrogant response, but it is an honest one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I am thoroughly (pun unintentional) disappointed with this article. I do not agree with your or Stoney&#8217;s perception of &#8220;optimization&#8221; vs. &#8220;friendly&#8221;. And I am the person who originated this topic/field and wrote the first book about&nbsp;it. </p>
<p>Search-engine friendly design follows the principles of search engine optimization (text, links, popularity/validation, searcher behavior). To separate the two?&nbsp;Ridiculous. </p>
<p>Search engine optimization is optimizing (which includes writing, coding, scripting, programming, designing, etc.) documents for people who use search engines, both the commercial web search engines and site search engines. Search engine optimization accommodates the wide variety of searcher behaviors, not only querying&nbsp;behavior.</p>
<p>IMHO, it requires knowledge of searchers and search&nbsp;engines. </p>
<p>Most SEOs, I believe, have a somewhat reasonable understanding of search engines. However, I think the general knowledge of searcher behaviors in the SEO arena, overall, is&nbsp;abysmal. </p>
<p>That is my first impression of the article. It may seem like a somewhat arrogant response, but it is an honest&nbsp;one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32056</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32056</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the article very much. 

It is definitely true that a lot of people out there don&#039;t really understand what search engine optimization is all about. There are a lot of details that go into keyword research and such, but everything has to flow naturally.

Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the article very&nbsp;much. </p>
<p>It is definitely true that a lot of people out there don&#8217;t really understand what search engine optimization is all about. There are a lot of details that go into keyword research and such, but everything has to flow&nbsp;naturally.</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32052</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32052</guid>
		<description>Great content. 
I had really wondered b/w these two terms(Optimized and Friendly). This post cleared my doubts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great content.<br />
I had really wondered b/w these two terms(Optimized and Friendly). This post cleared my&nbsp;doubts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/comment-page-1/#comment-32010</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/05/search-engine-friendly-vs-search-engine-optimized/#comment-32010</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Daniel - your article sums up the major issues fairly well. Glad you appreciated my article, as well!

Best,
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Daniel - your article sums up the major issues fairly well. Glad you appreciated my article, as&nbsp;well!</p>
<p>Best,<br />&nbsp;Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

