<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write Articles, or Write &#8220;Blog Posts?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Forextradingsystemfree.info</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-26776</link>
		<dc:creator>Forextradingsystemfree.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-26776</guid>
		<description>Nice post and a good place to comment on. I know that research shows that most ppl just scan through posts, so KISS is sometimes the only way to go, but there are some authors that have such a great writing style that no matter how long their articles are - people read every word..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and a good place to comment on. I know that research shows that most ppl just scan through posts, so KISS is sometimes the only way to go, but there are some authors that have such a great writing style that no matter how long their articles are - people read every&nbsp;word..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-23821</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-23821</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I would deem an article as something more bookmarkable more knowledgable. I see blog postings as informal and insignificat to the search engine user.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that's a common perception: and I think that's a completely artificial division. It's a vicious cycle of thinking and action: because many people believe that "blog posts" are informal and insignificant, they use blogs to post information which is poorly prepared, poorly researched, or casual. Because many people read blog posts which contains these posts, the same impression is maintained.

I think that all blog posts are articles: some of them are &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; articles, others are &lt;em&gt;bad&lt;/em&gt; articles, and many of them are just quick comments on articles. An "article" doesn't require one interpretation or another --- not all articles are equal. 

It's a conceptual division which is simply irrelevant and meaningless.

&lt;em&gt;However&lt;/em&gt;, what Jakob Nielsen describes as articles are definitely something that needs to be included for any successful blog. There's no reason not to also include brief postings which are less informative or bookmarkable, but you absolutely MUST author good articles as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I would deem an article as something more bookmarkable more knowledgable. I see blog postings as informal and insignificat to the search engine user.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that&#8217;s a common perception: and I think that&#8217;s a completely artificial division. It&#8217;s a vicious cycle of thinking and action: because many people believe that &#8220;blog posts&#8221; are informal and insignificant, they use blogs to post information which is poorly prepared, poorly researched, or casual. Because many people read blog posts which contains these posts, the same impression is maintained.</p>
<p>I think that all blog posts are articles: some of them are <em>good</em> articles, others are <em>bad</em> articles, and many of them are just quick comments on articles. An &#8220;article&#8221; doesn&#8217;t require one interpretation or another&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- not all articles are equal. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a conceptual division which is simply irrelevant and meaningless.</p>
<p><em>However</em>, what Jakob Nielsen describes as articles are definitely something that needs to be included for any successful blog. There&#8217;s no reason not to also include brief postings which are less informative or bookmarkable, but you absolutely MUST author good articles as&nbsp;well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adaptiv Media</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>Adaptiv Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>I can see where the guy is coming from. As one of these perfectionist designers, this is exactly how my stance would be. If doing things in this way gives you satisfaction and motivates you whilst I honestly believe most likely will help your online search rankings it can only be good practice. I would deem an article as something more bookmarkable more knowledgable. I see blog postings as informal and insignificat to the search engine user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see where the guy is coming from. As one of these perfectionist designers, this is exactly how my stance would be. If doing things in this way gives you satisfaction and motivates you whilst I honestly believe most likely will help your online search rankings it can only be good practice. I would deem an article as something more bookmarkable more knowledgable. I see blog postings as informal and insignificat to the search engine&nbsp;user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-22590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-22590</guid>
		<description>Articles or blog posts... it doesn't really matter. The main thing that they must contain useful information and some interesting ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Articles or blog posts&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t really matter. The main thing that they must contain useful information and some interesting&nbsp;ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17793</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17793</guid>
		<description>That's pretty much the answer I give clients who want to know "how to blog." It all comes down to writing what you want to write; anything else is artificial. 

That's the essential problem I have with authors who try and write some kind of proclamation stating that a blog post is any particular type of writing --- or that writing articles is somehow different from writing a blog post. It &lt;em&gt;can be&lt;/em&gt; --- but it doesn't &lt;em&gt;have to be&lt;/em&gt;.

Thanks, Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty much the answer I give clients who want to know &#8220;how to blog.&#8221; It all comes down to writing what you want to write; anything else is artificial. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the essential problem I have with authors who try and write some kind of proclamation stating that a blog post is any particular type of writing&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- or that writing articles is somehow different from writing a blog post. It <em>can be</em>&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- but it doesn&#8217;t <em>have to be</em>.</p>
<p>Thanks,&nbsp;Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackP</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17779</link>
		<dc:creator>JackP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17779</guid>
		<description>I've been thinking on this one for a while, and I think I've come up with the definitive answer.

"It depends".

It depends on who you are, what your site is for, how you are perceived, how you want to be perceived, who your audience is, and what it is you're talking about (amongst other things).

Who you are: if you're a big company, articles look more authoritative and informative; if you're a small company or an individual, short posts are more 'chatty' and welcoming. 

If your subject matter is brief, then be brief. But don't be afraid to give a longer opinion if you feel it's warranted.

In other words: write for &lt;strong&gt;yourself&lt;/strong&gt;; attempting to write for an audience is usually a mistake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking on this one for a while, and I think I&#8217;ve come up with the definitive answer.</p>
<p>&#8220;It depends&#8221;.</p>
<p>It depends on who you are, what your site is for, how you are perceived, how you want to be perceived, who your audience is, and what it is you&#8217;re talking about (amongst other things).</p>
<p>Who you are: if you&#8217;re a big company, articles look more authoritative and informative; if you&#8217;re a small company or an individual, short posts are more &#8216;chatty&#8217; and welcoming. </p>
<p>If your subject matter is brief, then be brief. But don&#8217;t be afraid to give a longer opinion if you feel it&#8217;s warranted.</p>
<p>In other words: write for <strong>yourself</strong>; attempting to write for an audience is usually a&nbsp;mistake&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17477</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17477</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
But who takes Jakob seriously these days??
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A lot of people. And, frankly, for good reason. For all that I may not always agree with Dr. Nielsen, he's always got a strong position and provides great information. He does look at web sites from somewhat of an information-purist perspective --- completely ignoring design or marketing --- and those of us who &lt;em&gt;need&lt;/em&gt; to consider these other issues are well-advised to take what he says into consideration; although not by following it slavishly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
But who takes Jakob seriously these days??
</p></blockquote>
<p>A lot of people. And, frankly, for good reason. For all that I may not always agree with Dr. Nielsen, he&#8217;s always got a strong position and provides great information. He does look at web sites from somewhat of an information-purist perspective&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- completely ignoring design or marketing&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- and those of us who <em>need</em> to consider these other issues are well-advised to take what he says into consideration; although not by following it&nbsp;slavishly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17456</guid>
		<description>But who takes Jakob seriously these days??

Alot of his points that while may be right are wrong from an old fuddy duddy point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who takes Jakob seriously these days??</p>
<p>Alot of his points that while may be right are wrong from an old fuddy duddy point of&nbsp;view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17402</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17402</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
But more importantly to me, I learn things from your blog and from the dozens of other blogs that I read. I have to filter out what is important to me and what is not. I don’t think it is that difficult to do.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks, David. And your point is excellent: we are perfectly capable of filtering. The article/blog post dichotomy is meaningless --- one is not &lt;em&gt;greater&lt;/em&gt; than the other. The true distinction which should be made (and which Dr. Nielsen is actually making; though masked by the wrong terms) is between high-quality writing and poor writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
But more importantly to me, I learn things from your blog and from the dozens of other blogs that I read. I have to filter out what is important to me and what is not. I don’t think it is that difficult to do.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks, David. And your point is excellent: we are perfectly capable of filtering. The article/blog post dichotomy is meaningless&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- one is not <em>greater</em> than the other. The true distinction which should be made (and which Dr. Nielsen is actually making; though masked by the wrong terms) is between high-quality writing and poor&nbsp;writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zemens</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17395</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/07/articles-or-blog-posts/#comment-17395</guid>
		<description>Certainly the internet is full of useless blog information and poorly written blog content. The internet is also full of poorly written articles and useless article information. I think the distinction between articles and posts is a distinction without meaningful difference.

The poor writing can be quantified, of course, but the usefullness or uselessness of the internet information is a much more subjective issue, isn't it?  

I agree that opinion has considerable value, Joe.  It's up to each of us to determine what value the opinion is and how useful it is to us.  I think we always need to remember learning itself has value, and tremendous value at that, even if it never results in selling more pistachios or more website design projects.

I am certain that Dr. Nielsen would consider the blogs that I write to be full of insignificant and useless information.  And perhaps that is the case for most people.  But there is no doubt that the blogs have caused my SEO rankings to improve and my business to increase based on cold contacts from new clients.  

The net result is there is more money in my business bank account than there was last year.  And the year before that. I think Dr. Nielsen  agrees that this is one of the goals of a blog post - to increase readership and generate business.  So I measure mine a success.

But more importantly to me, I learn things from your blog and from the dozens of other blogs that I read.  I have to filter out what is important to me and what is not.  I don't think it is that difficult to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the internet is full of useless blog information and poorly written blog content. The internet is also full of poorly written articles and useless article information. I think the distinction between articles and posts is a distinction without meaningful difference.</p>
<p>The poor writing can be quantified, of course, but the usefullness or uselessness of the internet information is a much more subjective issue, isn&#8217;t it?  </p>
<p>I agree that opinion has considerable value, Joe.  It&#8217;s up to each of us to determine what value the opinion is and how useful it is to us.  I think we always need to remember learning itself has value, and tremendous value at that, even if it never results in selling more pistachios or more website design projects.</p>
<p>I am certain that Dr. Nielsen would consider the blogs that I write to be full of insignificant and useless information.  And perhaps that is the case for most people.  But there is no doubt that the blogs have caused my SEO rankings to improve and my business to increase based on cold contacts from new clients.  </p>
<p>The net result is there is more money in my business bank account than there was last year.  And the year before that. I think Dr. Nielsen  agrees that this is one of the goals of a blog post - to increase readership and generate business.  So I measure mine a success.</p>
<p>But more importantly to me, I learn things from your blog and from the dozens of other blogs that I read.  I have to filter out what is important to me and what is not.  I don&#8217;t think it is that difficult to&nbsp;do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
