<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usability and Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-23778</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/#comment-23778</guid>
		<description>Usability issues with &quot;big name&quot; websites are probably the greater problem, since they&#039;re more likely to be depended on. 10 years ago, poor usability with something like Yahoo! Mail was something you&#039;d just live with --- there weren&#039;t a lot of options. Now, although you may be incredibly frustrated by usability issues, you&#039;ve also put 10 years into building your address book, email history, etc., and there&#039;s likely to be a great resistance to change.

But when looking for a site to accomplish something new, or to get information? Yeah. No patience at all. Why should I struggle with About.com when I can go to Wikipedia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usability issues with &#8220;big name&#8221; websites are probably the greater problem, since they&#8217;re more likely to be depended on. 10 years ago, poor usability with something like Yahoo! Mail was something you&#8217;d just live with&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;- there weren&#8217;t a lot of options. Now, although you may be incredibly frustrated by usability issues, you&#8217;ve also put 10 years into building your address book, email history, etc., and there&#8217;s likely to be a great resistance to&nbsp;change.</p>
<p>But when looking for a site to accomplish something new, or to get information? Yeah. No patience at all. Why should I struggle with About.com when I can go to&nbsp;Wikipedia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zemens - 1955 Design</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-23777</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zemens - 1955 Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/01/usability-and-trust/#comment-23777</guid>
		<description>You are correct, Joe.  There are simply too many websites and too many choices for the visitor to stand for much in the way of difficulty or inaccessibility.

Personally, when I visit a site and something gets in the way or doesn&#039;t function correctly, I move on quickly.  The truth is I am not usually in a particular hurry, or pressed for time, but there&#039;s just not much sense in dealing with sites that are troublesome.  The world is a big place and odds are I can find a site that satisifies what I am looking for and *is not* troublesome or inaccessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, Joe.  There are simply too many websites and too many choices for the visitor to stand for much in the way of difficulty or&nbsp;inaccessibility.</p>
<p>Personally, when I visit a site and something gets in the way or doesn&#8217;t function correctly, I move on quickly.  The truth is I am not usually in a particular hurry, or pressed for time, but there&#8217;s just not much sense in dealing with sites that are troublesome.  The world is a big place and odds are I can find a site that satisifies what I am looking for and *is not* troublesome or&nbsp;inaccessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
