Comments on: Google Site Links for “Joe Dolson” http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/ Tips and Commentary on Accessibility (and not always on topic.) Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:14:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Joe Dolson http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23936 Joe Dolson Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:33:41 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23936 Yep. Externally-driven decision making, there. It's clearly chosen pages which I consider to be pretty important for my own site, but I have little idea <em>why</em>.... Yep. Externally-driven decision making, there. It’s clearly chosen pages which I consider to be pretty important for my own site, but I have little idea why….

]]> By: Stevie D http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23935 Stevie D Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:24:19 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23935 Ah - I'd been wondering for ages how to get those sitelinks - if they just "happen" that would explain why I'd never got an answer! Ah - I’d been wondering for ages how to get those sitelinks - if they just “happen” that would explain why I’d never got an answer!

]]> By: Mike Cherim http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23909 Mike Cherim Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:35:54 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23909 Yeah, I thought that page choice was odd, but then again it is a random representation of what I do... though 2007 would be better lol. :) Yeah, I thought that page choice was odd, but then again it is a random representation of what I do… though 2007 would be better lol. :)

]]> By: Joe Dolson http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23908 Joe Dolson Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:48:42 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23908 @Mike: Yeah, your sitelinks are a little weird, Mike. Not sure that I'd consider your 2005 Archive to be quite that high priority! @Phil: Hey, could be worse. Although some of those seem pretty irrelevant, in the overall context of your site.... At least they're there! @Mike: Yeah, your sitelinks are a little weird, Mike. Not sure that I’d consider your 2005 Archive to be quite that high priority!

@Phil: Hey, could be worse. Although some of those seem pretty irrelevant, in the overall context of your site…. At least they’re there!

]]> By: Mike Cherim http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23907 Mike Cherim Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:05:21 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23907 I have that on mine too. Also pretty good selections, I'd pick some better ones, but I'm not complaining. Gotta love Google's love :) I have that on mine too. Also pretty good selections, I’d pick some better ones, but I’m not complaining. Gotta love Google’s love :)

]]> By: Phil Nash http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/04/google-site-links-for-joe-dolson/#comment-23906 Phil Nash Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:22:10 +0000 http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=236#comment-23906 Nice! I have to admit, I got jealous and checked my own site and I have site links for the search Unintentionally Blank. Sadly they aren't quite as good as yours, but I've done a bit of tweaking in Google Webmaster Tools to see if I can make a difference. Nice! I have to admit, I got jealous and checked my own site and I have site links for the search Unintentionally Blank. Sadly they aren’t quite as good as yours, but I’ve done a bit of tweaking in Google Webmaster Tools to see if I can make a difference.

]]>