<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Clark&#8217;s New Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/comment-page-1/#comment-28199</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=355#comment-28199</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure that's it's entirely accurate to describe this as "car[ing] so much about spelling" -- granted, there's no doubt that Joe does care a lot about spelling (and all things word-related, as far as I can tell) -- but in this case I think that it's more a matter of historical interest.  

Granted, if you read the preface it's clear that Joe &lt;em&gt;cares&lt;/em&gt; about spelling. Nonetheless, I don't think that &lt;em&gt;caring&lt;/em&gt; about spelling is the sole reason for this book's existence! 

Canadian English does have a very bizarre spelling environment; the question is why? How did Canadian English develop with this mix of spelling paths; some retaining the British preferences, others with a more American-type bent. (And how many Canadians actually know that Canadian English is an independent dialect?) The mixture of these spelling styles in one common usage is pretty interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s it&#8217;s entirely accurate to describe this as &#8220;car[ing] so much about spelling&#8221;&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;granted, there&#8217;s no doubt that Joe does care a lot about spelling (and all things word-related, as far as I can tell)&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;but in this case I think that it&#8217;s more a matter of historical interest.  </p>
<p>Granted, if you read the preface it&#8217;s clear that Joe <em>cares</em> about spelling. Nonetheless, I don&#8217;t think that <em>caring</em> about spelling is the sole reason for this book&#8217;s existence! </p>
<p>Canadian English does have a very bizarre spelling environment; the question is why? How did Canadian English develop with this mix of spelling paths; some retaining the British preferences, others with a more American-type bent. (And how many Canadians actually know that Canadian English is an independent dialect?) The mixture of these spelling styles in one common usage is pretty&nbsp;interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackP</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/comment-page-1/#comment-28175</link>
		<dc:creator>JackP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=355#comment-28175</guid>
		<description>This isn't one of those things where it's a bit popeye-ish, is it?

I yam what I yam and I am de man to look after de fence ...?

Out of interest then, why is one -se and the other -ce?

I always think it's quite impressive how Joe (C) manages to care so much about spelling etc - admittedly as a UK citizen I forcibly add the letter 'u' into things like 'colour' and get snarky when I don't see it over here - but my general ability to care about exact spelling isn't that high. However if you start apostrophising (is that a word? possibly more importantly for JC, should I spell it with a z or an s?) plurals, I'll come down on you like a ton of brick's.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t one of those things where it&#8217;s a bit popeye-ish, is it?</p>
<p>I yam what I yam and I am de man to look after de fence &#8230;?</p>
<p>Out of interest then, why is one -se and the other -ce?</p>
<p>I always think it&#8217;s quite impressive how Joe (C) manages to care so much about spelling etc - admittedly as a UK citizen I forcibly add the letter &#8216;u&#8217; into things like &#8216;colour&#8217; and get snarky when I don&#8217;t see it over here - but my general ability to care about exact spelling isn&#8217;t that high. However if you start apostrophising (is that a word? possibly more importantly for JC, should I spell it with a z or an s?) plurals, I&#8217;ll come down on you like a ton of brick&#8217;s.&nbsp;:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/comment-page-1/#comment-27526</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=355#comment-27526</guid>
		<description>Oh, darn. I was off a bit. There's a vague possibility I didn't research that thoroughly... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, darn. I was off a bit. There&#8217;s a vague possibility I didn&#8217;t research that thoroughly&#8230;&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2008/09/joe-clarks-new-book/comment-page-1/#comment-27523</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=355#comment-27523</guid>
		<description>Damn you, Dolson! There are only &lt;em&gt;18&lt;/em&gt; million speakers of Canadian English! How dare you exaggerate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you, Dolson! There are only <em>18</em> million speakers of Canadian English! How dare you&nbsp;exaggerate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
