<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best practices: keywords in alt attributes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geese Control</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-34372</link>
		<dc:creator>Geese Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-34372</guid>
		<description>Very good article. I always use both alt and titles, but to be honest I hate using title tags sometimes because I hate how it shows up when you hover the images. I wonder if there is a way to still put title tags, but hide it. I have that issue with flash as well. It&#039;s very annoying to put flash title&#039;s in because it shows you the title on hover of the flash. I don&#039;t want that! Do you feel it&#039;s necessary to do both? Obviously I agree if it&#039;s a blank image, don&#039;t put an alt, but for an image that actually has meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article. I always use both alt and titles, but to be honest I hate using title tags sometimes because I hate how it shows up when you hover the images. I wonder if there is a way to still put title tags, but hide it. I have that issue with flash as well. It&#8217;s very annoying to put flash title&#8217;s in because it shows you the title on hover of the flash. I don&#8217;t want that! Do you feel it&#8217;s necessary to do both? Obviously I agree if it&#8217;s a blank image, don&#8217;t put an alt, but for an image that actually has&nbsp;meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ava</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-33548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-33548</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s all a question of information overload: practically speaking, if a web site uses images to convey information, a screen reader user can’t disable them without rendering the web site unusable. If the site also fills other images with extra text, the same user may be overwhelmed by an unnecessary volume of keyword phrases.&quot;

Thanks for that information. As someone who believes (even at the cost of xhtml strict not validating because of &quot;aria: required&quot;) for the sake of screen readers, you&#039;ve just enlightened me on why NOT to stuff images with keywords. I just found your site and have a wealth of information to sift through on accessibility. Thanks! I&#039;m subscribing to your feeds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>It’s all a question of information overload: practically speaking, if a web site uses images to convey information, a screen reader user can’t disable them without rendering the web site unusable. If the site also fills other images with extra text, the same user may be overwhelmed by an unnecessary volume of keyword&nbsp;phrases.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for that information. As someone who believes (even at the cost of <abbr title="eXtensible HyperText Markup Language - HTML reformulated as XML">XHTML</abbr> strict not validating because of &#8220;aria: required&#8221;) for the sake of screen readers, you&#8217;ve just enlightened me on why NOT to stuff images with keywords. I just found your site and have a wealth of information to sift through on accessibility. Thanks! I&#8217;m subscribing to your&nbsp;feeds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avoorfareed</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-33538</link>
		<dc:creator>avoorfareed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-33538</guid>
		<description>the information that u say already heard in some way anyway thanks for your great information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the information that u say already heard in some way anyway thanks for your great&nbsp;information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G13 Media</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-33370</link>
		<dc:creator>G13 Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-33370</guid>
		<description>Hey joe I read alot of your articles and was just curious do you know the difference between a alt and title tag for linking purposes of images? Which one you believe would be most beneficial. Thanks in Advance Joe you have a great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey joe I read alot of your articles and was just curious do you know the difference between a alt and title tag for linking purposes of images? Which one you believe would be most beneficial. Thanks in Advance Joe you have a great&nbsp;blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herretoej</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32974</link>
		<dc:creator>herretoej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32974</guid>
		<description>I thought alt attributes will be useful for fetching hits from the search engine but after reading your post I need to rethink. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful information and I&#039;ll inform my friends to follow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought alt attributes will be useful for fetching hits from the search engine but after reading your post I need to rethink. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful information and I&#8217;ll inform my friends to follow&nbsp;it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iveck</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32840</link>
		<dc:creator>Iveck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32840</guid>
		<description>I know for a fact that naming your alt tags for internet marketers in general is only about search engine optimization.  It is unfortunate, but any possible way to gain more leverage is going to be an incentive.  I mean if doing your alt tags in this way will get you to the first page, and bump you up ahead of a guy that is a little more cautious about his alt tags then you are going to do it.  In my designs I make sure to name things as they are, and use my keywords when applicable.  But until this does not have a direct effect on rankings I don&#039;t think the general public will be implementing the appropriate practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know for a fact that naming your alt tags for internet marketers in general is only about search engine optimization.  It is unfortunate, but any possible way to gain more leverage is going to be an incentive.  I mean if doing your alt tags in this way will get you to the first page, and bump you up ahead of a guy that is a little more cautious about his alt tags then you are going to do it.  In my designs I make sure to name things as they are, and use my keywords when applicable.  But until this does not have a direct effect on rankings I don&#8217;t think the general public will be implementing the appropriate&nbsp;practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katlyn, ATT Uverse Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32773</link>
		<dc:creator>katlyn, ATT Uverse Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32773</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article, thanks for the pointers. I love this post. Very informative..thanks. I never realized that having to much alt attribute could be considered key word stuffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, thanks for the pointers. I love this post. Very informative..thanks. I never realized that having to much alt attribute could be considered key word&nbsp;stuffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32667</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing with us such interesting article. Accesibility issues are absolutely important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing with us such interesting article. Accesibility issues are absolutely&nbsp;important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32634</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32634</guid>
		<description>If the information is already communicated by other means, then the image doesn&#039;t add value for the disabled; only for visual users, as an alternate way of communicating the information. However, if only &lt;em&gt;part&lt;/em&gt; of the information has been communicated elsewhere, you still need to include the entirety of the information in the &lt;code&gt;alt&lt;/code&gt; attribute, for the sake of context.

Also -- thanks for the heads up! I missed that one when I stripped the tabindex attributes, clearly. Also, thanks for the suggestion on the comment subscription option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the information is already communicated by other means, then the image doesn&#8217;t add value for the disabled; only for visual users, as an alternate way of communicating the information. However, if only <em>part</em> of the information has been communicated elsewhere, you still need to include the entirety of the information in the <code>alt</code> attribute, for the sake of&nbsp;context.</p>
<p>Also&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;thanks for the heads up! I missed that one when I stripped the tabindex attributes, clearly. Also, thanks for the suggestion on the comment subscription&nbsp;option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dani</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2009/10/best-practices-keywords-in-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-32631</link>
		<dc:creator>dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=620#comment-32631</guid>
		<description>Joe, if an image (e.g statistic table) is supplemental to content. But there are some texts in the content have already explained the statistic counts. What is the best for the alt attribute?

[&lt;abbr title=&quot;out of topics&quot;&gt;OOT&lt;/abbr&gt;]:
a. Your &lt;code&gt;tabindex&lt;/code&gt; is still exist in name input.
b. Should the &quot;notify me ...&quot; line be placed before the submit button? Usability reason, I think. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, if an image (e.g statistic table) is supplemental to content. But there are some texts in the content have already explained the statistic counts. What is the best for the alt&nbsp;attribute?</p>
<p>[<abbr title="out of topics">OOT</abbr>]:<br />
a. Your <code>tabindex</code> is still exist in name input.<br />
b. Should the &#8220;notify me &#8230;&#8221; line be placed before the submit button? Usability reason, I think. <img src='http://www.joedolson.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
