<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forthcoming Updates on Federal Section 508 Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/</link>
	<description>Tips and Commentary on Web Accessibility, Usability, and Search Marketing best practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-46211</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-46211</guid>
		<description>Well Tom, I can&#039;t honestly say I&#039;m surprised. The government and glaciers are a good comparison with each other: very slow moving, and not always moving forward...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Tom, I can&#8217;t honestly say I&#8217;m surprised. The government and glaciers are a good comparison with each other: very slow moving, and not always moving&nbsp;forward&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-45962</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 01:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-45962</guid>
		<description>Who would have thought in 2010 that it will take so much longer to take into effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would have thought in 2010 that it will take so much longer to take into&nbsp;effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOaluuha</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-37007</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOaluuha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-37007</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the clarification, I was talking to another developer awhile back and he had me near convinced that this was going to be like how every restaurant has to have stalls of a certain size etc, that all sites would have to meet these standards. Still a bit confusing in some parts but I have a much clearer picture that this will not really affect my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the clarification, I was talking to another developer awhile back and he had me near convinced that this was going to be like how every restaurant has to have stalls of a certain size etc, that all sites would have to meet these standards. Still a bit confusing in some parts but I have a much clearer picture that this will not really affect my&nbsp;work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmarket18</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-36827</link>
		<dc:creator>webmarket18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-36827</guid>
		<description>Testing Documents for Section 508 Compliance. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrmarketology.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;search marketing&lt;/a&gt;

    * Each time you receive an electronic document, ensure that it is accessible.
    * Use of acquisition language ensures that at least one version will be accessible
    * Send a non-compliant document back to its creator for remediation!
          o Especially when working with non-departmental staff and consultants.
    * Documents that are submitted as part of the proposal cycle and as project deliverables (monthly reports, change requests) must meet Section 508.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing Documents for Section 508 Compliance. <a href="http://www.mrmarketology.com/" rel="nofollow">search&nbsp;marketing</a></p>
<p>    * Each time you receive an electronic document, ensure that it is accessible.<br />
    * Use of acquisition language ensures that at least one version will be accessible<br />
    * Send a non-compliant document back to its creator for remediation!<br />
          o Especially when working with non-departmental staff and consultants.<br />
    * Documents that are submitted as part of the proposal cycle and as project deliverables (monthly reports, change requests) must meet Section&nbsp;508.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Proulx</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-34880</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Proulx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-34880</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the clarification, I was talking to another developer awhile back and he had me near convinced that this was going to be like how every restaurant has to have stalls of a certain size etc, that all sites would have to meet these standards. Still a bit confusing in some parts but I have a much clearer picture that this will not really affect my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the clarification, I was talking to another developer awhile back and he had me near convinced that this was going to be like how every restaurant has to have stalls of a certain size etc, that all sites would have to meet these standards. Still a bit confusing in some parts but I have a much clearer picture that this will not really affect my&nbsp;work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dolson</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-34864</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-34864</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jay - although I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything particularly ridiculous in the clauses. Given that Section 508 is a legal document, it needs to be couched in a format which leaves minimal room for interpretation -- the legalese is a necessary part of the document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jay - although I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything particularly ridiculous in the clauses. Given that Section 508 is a legal document, it needs to be couched in a format which leaves minimal room for interpretation&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;the legalese is a necessary part of the&nbsp;document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2010/06/forthcoming-updates-on-federal-section-508-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-34835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joedolson.com/articles/?p=820#comment-34835</guid>
		<description>The clauses used to explain some of these guidelines are just ridiculous. Good job on trying to clarify them. Still looking for someone to do justice to the new FTC rules though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The clauses used to explain some of these guidelines are just ridiculous. Good job on trying to clarify them. Still looking for someone to do justice to the new FTC rules&nbsp;though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

