A useful CAPTCHA from reCAPTCHA

January 21, 2008

11 Comments

Topics: Accessibility.

Just wanted to add the comment, since I didn’t specify it explicitly, that I’m not trying to claim that the accessibility of this particularly CAPTCHA is all that fantastic — it’s pretty good, but there are serious problems. I’m just saying that it’s a neat idea. 😉 In case you don’t already know, “CAPTCHA” is an abbreviation for “Completely Automated Turing Test To Tell Computers and Humans Apart.” From an accessibility perspective, they tend to have significant problems — and […]

Continue reading “A useful CAPTCHA from reCAPTCHA” »

Google Toolbar ties to the Windows Accessibility API

December 27, 2007

1 Comment

Topics: Accessibility, News.

Quietly released on the Saturday before Christmas, (what, are they trying to hide this news?) Google announced that their latest Toolbar release supports the Windows Accessibility API. This is (obviously) a Windows-specific release, and even further, it’s just an Internet Explorer release. However, it’s definitely a step in the right direction! I was particularly glad to see the comment: Version 5 comes as a part of our ongoing efforts to enhance accessibility in our client-side and web applications, which is […]

Continue reading “Google Toolbar ties to the Windows Accessibility API” »

Supporting Standards that Support Accessibility

December 23, 2007

16 Comments

Topics: Accessibility, Semantics, Web standards.

The justification that a web site is accessible because it “follows standards” contains a serious fallacy. Specifically, the assumption that standards support accessibility. One root of current standard accessibility practice is conformance to the HTML or XHTML standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). This is a fine practice, and certainly should be maintained. Using correct syntax and following a standardized method of communicating information is always a solid best practice. However, this should absolutely not be taken […]

Continue reading “Supporting Standards that Support Accessibility” »

James Edwards on Web Accessibility

December 14, 2007

No Comments

Topics: Accessibility, Blogging.

If we call ourselves professionals, we owe it to our clients, their clients, and ourselves, to do our job properly. A chef must care about health, a builder must care about safety, and we must care about accessibility. James Edwards, aka ‘Brothercake’ has published a very neat argument on the frequently-asked question “Why Accessibility?” Read his comments at Why Accessibility? Because it’s our job!.

Continue reading “James Edwards on Web Accessibility” »

Thoughts about Content Labeling and Data

December 5, 2007

No Comments

Topics: Accessibility, Semantics, Usability.

Interestingly, it appears that some of the ideas discussed in this article are actually being actively tested by Google. As of September 2009, it appears that Google is actually putting this concept into practice. An interesting thought in indexing and handling page structure is the concept that different areas of a single page can be identified and considered independently from surrounding bodies of content. This particularly applies to specific and readily identifiable data-types, such as phone numbers, postal codes, or […]

Continue reading “Thoughts about Content Labeling and Data” »