Tag: Web standards

Graph the Semantic HTML Structure of Your Web Page

January 24, 2008

2 Comments

Topics: Semantics, Web standards.

In October of 2006, I published a brief article about Marcel Salathé’s interesting Java Applet to generate node graphs of web page structure. In that article, I stated: I’d love to be able to produce graphs where I chose the color coding pattern for particular tags. I could set all non-semantic tags to be bright red, to easily spot the condition of a site in that respect. I could focus my attentions on inline versus block elements, or I could […]

Continue reading “Graph the Semantic HTML Structure of Your Web Page” »

Supporting Standards that Support Accessibility

December 23, 2007

16 Comments

Topics: Accessibility, Semantics, Web standards.

The justification that a web site is accessible because it “follows standards” contains a serious fallacy. Specifically, the assumption that standards support accessibility. One root of current standard accessibility practice is conformance to the HTML (HyperText Markup Language) or XHTML (eXtensible HyperText Markup Language – HTML reformulated as XML (eXtensible Markup Language)) standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)). This is a fine practice, and certainly should be maintained. Using correct syntax and following […]

Continue reading “Supporting Standards that Support Accessibility” »

Care about standards? No, not exactly…

August 29, 2007

16 Comments

Topics: Web standards.

Recently, it seems like I’m writing a lot about web standards from an unusual perspective (for me). Rather than evangelizing techniques such as CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) and Web Standards, I’m trying to give every argument a fair discussion. I want to evangelize thinking. This is the result of a notable shift in thought: I’ve been moving in a slightly different direction in my way of approaching web development principles. I believe it’s a more sophisticated way of thinking, but […]

Continue reading “Care about standards? No, not exactly…” »